Nanny Cam Charges Dropped

Our Founding Scripture - Chronicles 9:21
21 And later Zechariah son of Meshelemiah had been responsible for guarding the entrance of the tabernacle.
22 In all, there were 212 gatekeepers in those days, and they were listed by genealogies in their villages. David and Samuel the seer had appointed their ancestors because they were reliable men.
23 These gatekeepers and their descendants, by their divisions, were responsible for guarding the entrance to the house of the LORD, the house that was formerly a tent.
24 The gatekeepers were stationed on all four sides—east, west, north, and south.

Commitment to Excellence

Would your churches video surveillance of your infants and children's areas stand up in court?

Remember that cheap 16 channel - 30 Frame Per Second - 120 GB Digital Video Recorder your church put in to guard against child abuse.

Think Again on what cheap means! We have developed video surveillance standards that promote excellence, not cheapness.

Click here to watch the Video - 17MB download

Nanny Cleared of Violently Shaking Baby

Claudio Muro Spent More Than Two Years in Jail

March 21, 2006 —

Two and a half years ago, Claudia Muro was sent to jail pending eight charges of aggravated child abuse

that stemmed from a hidden home videotape that had allegedly caught her violently shaking a baby.

Today she is free, her name has been cleared, and the video has been totally discredited.

"In America, the truth will set you free," Allison Gilman, Muro's lawyer, told a Florida television station.

Brett and Jennifer Schwartz installed a hidden "nanny cam" inside their Florida home in 2003 after

becoming suspicious about the way Muro, a Peruvian immigrant, was caring for their 5-month-old

daughter, Lauren. When the parents reviewed the video, they called police and Muro was arrested.

"It's plainly clear of what's going on," Brett Schwartz told "Good Morning America" in 2003. "There's

nothing taken out of context in that video."

But earlier this month, the case was thrown out and prosecutors acknowledged the video evidence was

worthless.

Top forensic video experts testified the nanny cam actually took still pictures a few times in a second,

which could make gentle motions appear violent.

The Schwartzes still believe the video shows their baby being abused.

"If the state needs our daughter to sustain brain damage to prove their case, they let the nanny walk away a

free woman," Brett Schwartz said in a written statement. "However, this shows a major flaw in our

criminal justice system."

This case is an exception. Often video evidence is more clear-cut. In a case in Louisiana, a video camera

caught a 3½-year-old with cerebral palsy being tossed around like a rag doll, and in Chicago an 8-monthold

was seen being slapped repeatedly by his caretaker. In Texas, a nanny was caught using obscenities

and her hand to punish the child she was watching.

As for Muro, now 32, for more than two years in prison she refused to accept a plea bargain. Now she has

been vindicated.

"It's like peace and calm, and finally it's here, it's over," she said.

Her lawyer said Muro would proceed with a civil suit against her former employers.